Federal sentences can be reduced for substantial assistance in investigating or prosecuting another individual, and the mandatory minimum may not be required to be served. Rules under which a sentence is commonly reduced for “substantial assistance " include Section 5K1.1 of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and Rule 35 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.
Both of these motions fall under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(e). These rules can be used to reduce a mandatory minimum sentence.
When it comes to cooperation in federal cases across the nation, prosecutors aim to get individuals charged with crimes to cooperate. This cooperation, which they refer to as substantial assistance, can lead to significant benefits. It involves assisting in prosecuting individuals who have already been indicted or who have not been indicted by the federal government. The potential benefits of this cooperation can bring a sense of hope and optimism to those facing federal charges.
When a person cooperates with the government, this cooperation is documented in their plea agreement. If they provide substantial assistance, the government will reciprocate with a benefit. This benefit can be a reduction in the sentence, often referred to as a 5 K departure, which can significantly reduce the time a person spends in prison. For more information, see related: Use of Federal Rule Criminal Procedure 35(b).
What is Substantial Assistance?
Substantial assistance is a somewhat ambiguous term, as it is up to the government to determine whether an individual has provided it. It often involves providing information that leads to the arrest or conviction of other individuals involved in criminal activities. This could be information about the location of a criminal hideout, the identity of a key player in a criminal organization, or details about a criminal operation. However, the specifics can vary depending on the case. This ambiguity can sometimes lead to disputes over whether substantial assistance was provided.
At times, the Judge may need to be involved in the process. However, the ultimate goal is to have the prosecutor file a motion for a 5K departure, which can allow a person to avoid a mandatory minimum and significantly reduce their sentence.
We see it going on right now in our government. People are cooperating in this investigation regarding the President of the United States, and the prosecutor, in this case, is meeting with these individuals, along with agents, to ask them questions and gather information.
Depending on the answers and whether they feel they're being honest, they can consider reducing their sentence if they've already been convicted of a crime or have pleaded guilty to a crime and will soon be sentenced. Again, this is cooperation.
As stated above, the 5K departure is the departure that allows the federal sentencing guidelines to be applied, which enables the government to assign points or levels to a person's sentence, ultimately resulting in a reduced sentence.
Proffer Session
So, they have you come in and meet with them. They do what's called a proffer session, where you basically first give all the information about yourself — your involvement, what you did, answer all their questions honestly — and then they start to talk about and ask questions about other targets that they're interested in getting information about.
Depending on the usefulness and accuracy of your information, the government can reward you. Sometimes, this involves testifying against individuals. If your testimony is truthful, honest, and accurate, it could result in a 5K departure, a significant reduction in your sentence.
There are various ways to cooperate with the government, depending on the circumstances. Of course, there are ramifications when you cooperate with the government. Other people may potentially discover that you cooperated, and you could be at risk. This risk includes potential retaliation from the individuals you provided information about, as well as the social stigma associated with being a 'snitch'.
The government does its best to ensure that people's identities are not revealed to anyone when they're cooperating. Still, sometimes it's unavoidable because they only possess the information that would identify the other person. The other person is obviously able to figure out that someone must have provided that information, and there are only a limited number of people who could have given it.
Is Cooperating In Your Best Interest?
Deciding whether to cooperate with the government is a crucial decision that must be made in consultation with your attorney. This ensures you make an educated and informed decision that is truly in your best interest. The guidance of your attorney can provide a sense of reassurance and direction in this complex process.
However, ultimately, you must be able to provide accurate information to the government. Sometimes, people simply don't have accurate information to share. So, they can cooperate all they want, but if it doesn't provide substantial assistance to the government, then they're just wasting their time and will not get any benefit. This emphasis on the need for accurate information can make the audience feel responsible and aware of the process.
That's one of the first things you must discuss with your attorney, and your attorney needs to consult with the government as well, to determine whether you can provide them with information that would be helpful. Sometimes, it's pretty clear that you can or cannot. At other times, it's unclear, and you have to sit down and talk to them before you can truly assess the type of information you have that might be valuable to them and whether they're actually interested in it.
Sometimes, they already have the information you're going to provide, so it doesn't add much value beyond corroborating other information they already have. Contact the federal criminal defense lawyers at the Hedding Law Firm to review the details of your case and whether substantial cooperation is in your best interest.
Related Content: