NATIONWIDE FEDERAL CRIMINAL DEFENSE (833) 594-2133

Weapons Charges

Federal Weapons Crimes – 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)

Federal weapons charges are among the most serious offenses prosecuted in the United States District Court.

One of the most powerful federal firearm statutes is 18 U.S.C. § 924(c), which imposes mandatory minimum prison sentences for using, carrying, or possessing a firearm during and in relation to a federal crime of violence or drug trafficking crime.

Unlike many state gun offenses, a § 924(c) conviction requires mandatory consecutive prison time. That means the sentence for the firearm charge is added on top of the underlying federal crime.

If you are under investigation or charged with a federal weapons offense, early legal intervention is critical.

Your best hope for a favorable outcome is with an experienced criminal defense attorney at the Hedding Law Firm in Los Angeles. To schedule a consultation, call (866) 986-2092 or use the contact form here.


What Is 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)?

18 U.S.C. § 924(c) makes it a federal crime to:

  • Use or carry a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence or drug trafficking crime; or

  • Possess a firearm in furtherance of such a crime

The key element is the connection between the firearm and the underlying federal offense.

The firearm does not need to be discharged to trigger the statute. Mere possession can be enough if prosecutors prove it was possessed “in furtherance of” the crime.


What Must Prosecutors Prove?

To convict someone under § 924(c), federal prosecutors must prove beyond a reasonable doubt:

  1. A qualifying federal crime of violence or drug trafficking occurred

  2. The defendant used, carried, or possessed a firearm

  3. The firearm was used during and in relation to, or possessed in furtherance of, the underlying crime

The phrase “in furtherance of” requires evidence that the firearm advanced or helped facilitate the crime.

Simply owning a firearm is not sufficient.


Mandatory Minimum Sentences Under § 924(c)

Section 924(c) carries strict mandatory minimum penalties that must run consecutively to any other sentence.

Typical mandatory minimums include:

  • 5 years for possession of a firearm in furtherance of a crime

  • 7 years if the firearm was brandished

  • 10 years if the firearm was discharged

  • 30 years if the firearm was a machine gun or destructive device

  • Life imprisonment if death results

These penalties are added on top of the sentence for the underlying offense.

For example, a defendant facing a 10-year mandatory minimum drug sentence could receive an additional 5-year mandatory minimum for a § 924(c) conviction, resulting in at least 15 years in federal prison.


Federal Weapons Crimes Commonly Charged With § 924(c)

Section 924(c) is often charged alongside:

Federal prosecutors frequently use § 924(c) as leverage in plea negotiations due to the mandatory consecutive nature of the sentence.


How Is § 924(c) Different From 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)?

18 U.S.C. § 922(g) prohibits possession of a firearm by certain prohibited persons, including:

  • Convicted felons

  • Individuals subject to restraining orders

  • Persons convicted of domestic violence

  • Fugitives

  • Unlawful users of controlled substances

  • Certain non-citizens

A § 922(g) violation carries up to 10 years in federal prison.

By contrast, § 924(c) requires an underlying federal crime and imposes mandatory consecutive sentencing.


What Is the Link Between Guns and Drugs?

In federal drug cases, prosecutors often allege that a firearm was possessed to:

  • Protect drugs

  • Protect drug proceeds

  • Intimidate competitors

  • Secure a trafficking location

However, there must be a proven nexus between the gun and the drug offense.

If drugs are found in one location and a firearm in another unrelated location, the government may struggle to prove the required connection.

Each case turns on specific facts.


Common Defenses to 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)

Federal weapons cases require careful legal analysis. Potential defenses include:

No Connection to the Crime

The government must show the firearm furthered the underlying crime. Mere proximity is not always enough.

Illegal Search and Seizure

Many federal gun charges arise from searches. If the search violated the Fourth Amendment, the evidence may be suppressed.

Lack of Possession

Constructive possession cases often involve disputes over ownership or control.

No Qualifying Predicate Offense

If the underlying federal crime does not qualify as a crime of violence or drug trafficking offense, the § 924(c) charge may fail.

Early motion practice can significantly impact case outcomes.


The Antiquity Defense in Federal Gun Cases

Federal law excludes certain antique firearms from the definition of “firearm” under 18 U.S.C. § 921(a)(16).

If a weapon was manufactured before 1898 or qualifies under the antique firearm definition, it may not meet the statutory definition required for certain federal charges.

The defendant bears the burden of raising this antiquity defense.


How Federal Investigations Work

Federal weapons cases are investigated by agencies such as:

  • Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives

  • Drug Enforcement Administration

  • Federal Bureau of Investigation

Investigations may include:

  • Wiretaps

  • Search warrants

  • Confidential informants

  • Undercover operations

  • Digital forensic analysis

Federal prosecutions move quickly once charges are filed.


Why Federal Defense Experience Is Critical

Federal firearm cases are different from state cases because:

  • Mandatory minimums severely limit judicial discretion

  • Sentences must run consecutively

  • Federal sentencing guidelines can increase exposure

  • Prosecutors aggressively pursue enhancements

Strategic defense may include:

  • Challenging the firearm nexus

  • Filing suppression motions

  • Negotiating plea agreements to avoid § 924(c)

  • Presenting mitigation evidence

The difference between winning or losing a § 924(c) challenge can mean years of freedom.


Frequently Asked Questions

Is a § 924(c) sentence served at the same time as the underlying offense?

No. The sentence must run consecutively, meaning it is added on top of the underlying sentence.

Does the gun have to be fired?

No. Possession alone can trigger the statute if it was in furtherance of the crime.

Can a legally registered firearm still lead to charges?

Yes. Legal registration does not prevent a § 924(c) charge if the gun is connected to a federal crime.

What qualifies as a crime of violence?

Certain federal offenses such as robbery or carjacking may qualify, depending on current case law.

Can the charge be negotiated away?

In some cases, skilled negotiation may lead to dismissal of the § 924(c) count as part of a plea agreement.


Contact a Federal Criminal Defense Lawyer

Federal weapons charges, particularly under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c), carry life-altering consequences. Mandatory minimum sentences and consecutive penalties make these cases extremely serious.

If you or a loved one is facing federal gun charges, immediate legal representation is essential.

The Hedding Law Firm is based in Los Angeles, California, and provides aggressive federal criminal defense nationwide.

Contact us today for a confidential consultation to review your case and develop a strategy to protect your freedom.

Related Content:

Contact Us Today

Hedding Law Firm is committed to answering your questions about Federal Criminal Defense issues in Los Angeles and Encino California. We'll gladly discuss your case with you at your convenience. Contact us today to schedule an appointment.

Menu