Recent Blog Posts in 2010 |
| 5 posts found. Viewing page 1 of 1. |
| December 20, 2010 |
| Man Pleaded Guilty to Selling Ecstasy to a Woman who Died of an Overdose |
| Posted By Admin |
 |
Marvin Bada, 24, pleaded guilty Friday in Federal court to selling the banned drug Ecstasy to a young woman, which resulted in her death. Bada faces a minimum of 20 years in prison when he is sentenced in March. Bada admitted selling Ecstasy in April 2009 to Laura Luna, 21, who died of an overdose two weeks later.
Under federal law, the penalties for possession, manufacture, or delivery a Schedule one controlled substance range as high as a $100,000 fine and 99 years in prison, depending on how much of the amount is seized by federal officials.
If you or someone you know is being charged for possession, manufacture, or delivery of a Schedule 1 controlled substance it is crucial that you hire an experience and qualified federal criminal defense attorney. The attorneys at the Hedding Law firm have a combined 75 years of experience in these types of cases. Contact our office today to set up a free face-to-face consultation.
|
 |
| Continue reading "Man Pleaded Guilty to Selling Ecstasy to a Woman who Died of an Overdose " » |
|
Permalink |
| |
| December 14, 2010 |
| WHO IS REALLY TO BLAME FOR THE COLLAPSE OF THE REAL ESTATE MARKET? |
| Posted By Admin |
 |
There are so many angles related to this topic that I could write a book on it. Recently I have seen major banks attempting to blame their employees actions for failed loans and issues surrounding real estate related problems. It is becoming more and more clear to me that the banks are trying to use these employees as "scape goats" for there own questionable practices and policies.
In a nut shell, the banks are claiming that their employees accepted loans (on behalf of the banks) without verifying income from people who could not afford to make their mortgage payments. Yet, in many cases the banks made thousands of dollar on these loans. Moreover, the banks are the ones that set up the policies that allowed the subject loans to be made on stated income...with no mechanism to verify whether a particular person could actually afford to pay the loan.
Currently there is a federal case pending in the Central Valley where federal prosecutors are claiming that between 2000 and 2005 real estate agents inflated property prices to cover undisclosed payments made to themselves. In addition, they claim that other illegal schemes involved buyers and sellers of homes lying to extract equity from their homes; real estate investors lied to finance property flipping schemes; home builders lied and used straw buyers to get properties off their books; organized crime associates used fraudulently obtained financing to buy houses to use as indoor marijuana farms; and even a policeman who is charged with submitting false information to obtain two different mortgage loans.
I am waiting for the prosecutors to go after the true culprits....the banks! The banks and their Boards of Directors are the ones that set the wheels in motion and laid the ground work for the problems we all now face. They are the ones that took our tax dollars from the President of the United States (to allegedly help us) and have held onto and paid out the money for themselves.
If you are facing federal criminal charges it is important that you have a qualified attorney fighting on your side. The attorneys at the Hedding law firm have a combined 75 years of experience, they will gather all the facts pertaining to your case and work hard to get the best possible outcome. Contact our office today to schedule a free face-to-face consultation. |
 |
| Continue reading "WHO IS REALLY TO BLAME FOR THE COLLAPSE OF THE REAL ESTATE MARKET?" » |
|
Permalink |
| |
| December 02, 2010 |
| Man Sentenced to Over 14 Years in Prison for Running a Telemarketing Scheme |
| Posted By Admin |
 |
Dilon Sherif, 49, has been sentenced to 14 1/2 years for running an international lottery scam that took in 1.8 million. The victims were mostly elderly and were lured to the scheme with promises of huge winnings in international lotteries. In addition to the prison sentence, Judge Pregerson ordered Sherif to pay $924,613 in restitution to his victims.
Sherif was extradited from England last year and in June pleaded guilty in the United States District court to three counts of mail fraud involving tele-marketing companies based in British Columbia. Sherif along with telemarketers that worked for him called elderly victims in the United States, telling them they had won or could win, a large amount of money in foreign lotteries. The victims were told that they had to pay for taxes or other fees to collect their winnings. Once the money was received, Sherif and his employees would call the victims again. telling them they had won more money, but would receive their winnings only if they sent additional payments. Sherif has a case in Seattle, Spain, and Los Angeles. Sherif's Los Angeles case was filed in September 2001. Sherif was arrested in Canada, but was released on bond within a day. He failed to appear in court and was a fugitive until December 2008, when he was arrested in London.
If you are facing federal fraud charges a qualified attorney is key to the success of your case. The criminal defense attorneys at the Hedding law firm have a combined 75 years of experience and are committed to getting the best possible outcome for their clients. Contact our office today to set up a free face-to-face consultation. |
 |
| Continue reading "Man Sentenced to Over 14 Years in Prison for Running a Telemarketing Scheme" » |
|
Permalink |
| |
| November 04, 2010 |
| United States v. Booker |
| Posted By Admin |
 |
United States v. Booker, was a United States Supreme Court decision that had to do with criminal sentencing. The court's decision was that the Sixth Amendment right to jury trial requires that, other than a prior conviction, only facts admitted by a defendant or proved beyond a reasonable doubt to a jury can be used to calculate a sentence, whether the defendant has pleaded guilty or been convicted at trial. The maximum sentence a judge may impose is a sentence based upon the facts admitted by the defendant or proved to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt.
The provision of the federal sentencing statute that required federal district judges to impose a sentence within the Federal Guidelines range was struck down by the Court in a split-majority ruling. This ruling was a result of a ruling made six months earlier in Blakely v. Washington, in which the Court had imposed the same requirement on a guidelines sentencing scheme that was used in the state of Washington. The Blakely decision came from Apprendi v. New Jersey, where the Court held that, except for prior convictions, any fact that increases the defendant's punishment above the statutory maximum punishment had to be presented to a jury and proved beyond a reasonable doubt.
In modern sentencing, the "statutory maximum" is the greatest sentence the judge can impose based solely on the jury's factfinding. If any facts are presented exposing the defendant to punishment above the guideline range, they must be submitted to a jury and be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
If you have been charged with, or are under investigation for, any federal crime contact our office today. The skilled federal crimes attorneys at the Hedding Law firm have a combined 75 years of experience, we will give your unique case the attention, resources, and dedicated legal counsel that it deserves. |
 |
| Continue reading "United States v. Booker " » |
|
Permalink |
| |
| October 28, 2010 |
| Welcome to our Los Angeles Federal Crimes Blog |
| Posted By Los Angeles Federal Crimes Attorney |
 |
| We are pleased to announce the launch of our Los Angeles Federal Crimes Blog. |
 |
| Continue reading "Welcome to our Los Angeles Federal Crimes Blog" » |
|
Permalink |
| |
| 5 posts found. Viewing page 1 of 1. |
|